Comments on "Daily Crap 2009-05-14"

Use the form below to leave your own comment.

Posted by "Kassen" at May 15, 2009, in the afternoon

That's interesting. I liked it because it inspired me so much and never considered whether I had a opinion on it beyond that. What didn't you like?

Posted by "Tom" at May 16, 2009, in the afternoon

The introduction led me to believe that the book would relate macro- and microsounds much more rigorously than it later did. The "design lots of grains then play them at random intervals" model wasn't very satisfying and neither were the results of the reconstruction procedures described later. All in all it was a lot of creative inspiration but not the guidance I was expecting.

Posted by "Kassen" at May 16, 2009, in the night

Ah, yes, I can see that.

I was missing a bit of exactly what this link between expression and the formulae was supposed to consist of, exactly. I suppose that's up to the individual artist but that aspect still kept me wanting.

New Comment